Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- midnight:history:1224:4 [2018/12/02 12:36] – created sam
+++ midnight:history:1224:4 [2018/12/02 12:43] (current) – sam
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-====== Legal Precedence ======
+====== Magi ex Flambeau ======
-== Proceedings of the Stonehenge Tribunal, AD 927 ==
+//Summer, 1224//
-Kalsua ex Tytalus of Sursum covenant wishes to declare the maga Helione ex Tytalus as rogue and an enemy of the Order. She charges her with theft of property from the sanctums of several magi in Sursum, of betraying the covenant charter, and of declaring an illegal wizards war against the whole covenant in an attempt to cover up her crimes.
+The magus Thormod ex Flambeau of Montverte covenant in Normandy arrives at Cruentis Petram to investigate the murder of his filius, Lucius ex Flambeau of Nocte Flamma. The paren of Lucretia, Estevan of Lapis Crudus covenant is believed to be dead, lost when that covenant vanished into its regio during the Long Day.
-Kalsua also wishes to charge the magus Bulrion ex Tytalus with theft of property, of aiding an enemy maga against his own covenant and of breaking the covenant charter by leaving without payment of dues.
+Thormod travels with two other Flambeau, and they intend to investigate the abbey at Bullington very closely. He is grateful to the magi of Cruentis Petram for their own investigations. He tells them that he will send people to collect the deceased Flamebeau's property sometime next year, but if they wish to make copies of any books then they may do so.
-The decision of the Tribunal was to deny the request of Sursum covenant in regards to declaring Helione ex Tytalus a rogue. Helione was also found innocent of the charge of illegally declaring a war. Sufficient notice is deemed to have been given according to the strict letter of the law. Since the magi of Sursum refused to state what damage was done, what items were stolen, or which cult secrets were betrayed, Helione ex Tytalus was declared innocent of all charges.
-Bulrion ex Tytalus was charged with paying 7 pawns of vis to Sursum for the breaking of their charter, but all other charges are denied due to lack of evidence.
-== Proceedings of the Stonehenge Tribunal, AD 934 ==
-The charge of the murder of the maga Kaliste ex Tytalus had been made against Helione ex Tytalus by Kalsua ex Tytalus of Sursum covenant. Other than the disappearance of both maga, no evidence was presented. Given that Helione had not been seen for several years, and those who brought the charges were now dead, this Tribunal decided to take no further action.
-The maga Morridir ex Diedne of Lux Draconis covenant claimed damage to her lab by the magi of Sursum covenant and sought restitution. The Tribunal found Sursum to be guilty. However, given that the only surviving magus of Sursum was an apprentice at the time, the Tribunal decided that he could not be held responsible and therefore no restitution was permitted.
-Quaesitor Jardunicus of Blackthorn has investigated the destruction of Sursum covenant and all the magi within. Due to the covenant’s close relationship with the nobles of Cornwall, it was attacked and destroyed by the forces of Athelstan in 931. The Tribunal will take no further action in this, and revenge attacks against Athelstan were forbidden.
-Examination of the surviving notes left in the ruins implied that several magi of the covenant, including Kalsua ex Tytalus, were Titanoi cultists who were experimenting with the summoning of demons. Several letters imply that at least one other member of the cult outside of Stonehenge may also be involved in these diabolic practises. The Quaesitor at Fudarus covenant has been notified. The surviving apprentice was declared innocent of these events and now resides at Blackthorn, under the tutelage of Bordanus ex Bonisagus.